Paying on Time Matters: Best Practices for Public Agencies (Part 1 of 4)

Your school district, city, county, or special district operates under a different set of payment expectations than private businesses. While private companies can prioritize payments based on cash flow or vendor relationships, California public agencies face legal obligations, statutory deadlines, and taxpayer accountability that demand consistent, timely payment processing.

---

When public agencies pay late, the consequences extend beyond damaged vendor relationships:

• Statutory interest penalties — California law often requires interest payments on late payments

• Increased bid prices — Contractors and vendors factor payment history into pricing; slow-paying agencies get higher bids

• Vendor attrition — Good vendors stop bidding on your projects if payment is chronically late

• Staff time waste — Late payments generate vendor calls, emails, and disputes that consume staff resources

• Board/public scrutiny — Unpaid invoice backlogs become board agenda items and potential media stories

This 4-part series provides a quick look based on a deeper dive article with code references and more detail click here

Part 1 – Paying on Time –Steps to Success

The compliance, cost, and credibility impacts of late payments

Timely payment is not optional for California public agencies. Unlike private businesses, school districts, cities, counties, and special districts operate under statutory deadlines, audit scrutiny, and public accountability. Late payments create legal risk, increase project costs, and erode vendor trust.

Why This Matters In California

Late payments can trigger statutory interest penalties, higher bid pricing, vendor attrition, staff inefficiencies, and board or public scrutiny. These risks directly affect audits, budgets, and public confidence.

California public agencies are expected to process payments promptly based on contract terms, local ordinances, and applicable statutes. While exact timelines vary by agency type, most agencies target payment within 20–30 days from receipt of a properly submitted invoice.

What To Do Next – Checklist

• Confirm your agency’s internal payment policy – If you don’t have one, address it

• Track invoice receipt dates consistently – Always first date agency receives it (email date, stamped in from mail bag)

• Set a 20–30 day internal processing target – If invoice has issues then document communication with vendor with dates and who was involved with next steps

• Monitor invoices approaching 30 days – If nearing 30 days and no notes, there may be an issue that needs to be chased down and solved

Common Pitfalls

1. Assuming informal past practices are compliant – Looking back a little and finding ways to improve will save time in the future

2. No centralized invoice tracking – Consider a single email for submission of invoices and have more than one person in charge of getting them moving

3. Delayed department approvals – If constant delays consider identifying a 2^nd authorized person in that department

4. Lack of documentation for delays or issues – Auditors love explanations and proof

5. Ignoring vendor statements – They are gold and great indicators of timely payment processing

   
   

Key Takeaways

• Timely payment is a compliance issue, not just courtesy

• 20–30 days is a practical best-practice target

• Late payments increase costs and audit risk

• Chasing payments that are missing or late takes more time and effort than moving towards a solid system where that problem becomes rare

For agencies seeking structured tools to improve payment accountability, Account-Ability offers a framework to consider: https://www.colbitech.com/account-ability

This guidance is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. California public agencies should consult with their legal counsel and auditors to ensure compliance with applicable statutes, regulations, and local policies.